Note 20

[ BACK ] Which is the sense in which Hazrat Mirza does not deny prophethood and messengership? It is the linguistic or metaphorical sense in which a saint may be called prophet. He wrote:

1."There is no doubt that this humble one has come from God as a muhaddas for this Umma, and a muhaddas is also in one sense a prophet. Though he does not possess complete prophethood, nonetheless he is a prophet in a partial sense because he has the privilege of communication with God, and matters of the unseen are disclosed to him, and his revelation, like the revelation of messengers and prophets, is also protected against interference by the devil." (Tauzih Maram, January 1891, pp. 9-10)

2. "There is no claim of prophethood. On the contrary, the claim is of muhaddasiyya [being a muhaddas], which has been advanced by the command of God. And what doubt is there that muhaddasiyya has within it one function of the powers of prophethood. Considering that true visions are one element out of the forty-six constituents of prophethood, then if muhaddasiyya --- which is described in the Holy Quran alongside prophethood and messengership, and for which there is a hadith in Sahih Bukhari --- is declared to be metaphorical prophethood, or is called one of the aspects of prophethood, does this imply a claim to prophethood?" (Izala Auham, September 1891, pp. 421-422)

It is this sense in which Hazrat Mirza does not deny prophethood, the sense in which any muhaddas may be called prophet.