Note 29
[ BACK ] | One
who is not possessor of shariah is not a prophet, as
mentioned earlier in Note 24. The term "non-shariah
bearing prophet" was, like the terms zill, burooz
and fana fir-rasul, coined by Sufi writers and
saints as referring to one who is not a real prophet but
is spoken to by God. It is not a type of prophet. Nowhere
do the Holy Quran or Hadith mention a kind of prophethood
called "non-shariah bearing". What the Quran
and Hadith refer to as a wali or muhaddas,
that is what in the Sufi terminology is sometimes known
as "non-shariah bearing prophet". It is abundantly clear from Hazrat Mirza's own writings that, besides the possessors of shariah, others who receive revelation are saints, and not prophets of some kind. He writes:
According to this statement, besides "possessors of shariah" (sahib-i shariah) all others who receive revelation are saints or muhaddas.
Here Hazrat Mirza says that the reason why saints are not prophets is that the Islamic shariah has been perfected with the revelation of the Quran. A prophet would only need to come if the shariah required change or improvement. So there are only two categories: (1) saints, and they are not prophets in reality, and (2) prophets, and they come to perfect the shariah. |