[ BACK ] |
These
are almost the same examples of revelation that Hazrat
Mirza had quoted in a letter which he wrote and published
two years earlier in August 1899. He wrote there:
"The situation is
that, although for twenty years I have been
constantly receiving Divine revelation, often the
word rasul or nabi has occurred in it.
For example, there is the revelation: 'He it is Who
sent His messenger (rasul) with guidance and
the true religion', and the revelation: 'the champion
of God in the mantle of the prophets', and the
revelation: 'A prophet came into the world but the
world accepted him not'. There are many such
revelations in which the word nabi or rasul
has occurred regarding myself. However, that person
is mistaken who thinks that by this prophethood and
messengership is meant real prophethood and
messengership ... in fact, by the word rasul
is only meant 'one sent by God', and by the word nabi
is only meant 'one who makes prophecies' having
received intimation from God, or one who discloses
hidden matters. As these words, which are only in a
metaphorical sense, cause trouble in Islam, leading
to very bad consequences, these terms should not be
used in our community's ordinary talk and everyday
language. It should be believed from the bottom of
the heart that prophethood has terminated with the
Holy Prophet Muhammad, may peace and the blessings of
God be upon him, as God Almighty says: 'He is the
Messenger of God and the Khatam an-nabiyyin."
(Al-Hakam, 17 August 1899, page 6)
So, not only does Hazrat
Mirza emphasize that these words 'prophet' and
'messenger' in his revelation are purely metaphorical, or
used according to their linguistic and not religious
sense, he further instructs his followers to avoid using
them lightly, in ordinary talk, as he fears that such
free use would lead to "very bad consequences."
|