[ BACK ] |
It
has been conclusively show above that the Promised
Messiah regarded and treated as Muslim all those Muslims
who did not believe in his claims but refrained from
denouncing him as kafir. This fact is sufficient
to demolish the entire Qadiani edifice based on the
doctrine that Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a prophet.
Since people remain Muslims without believing in the
claims of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, and do not become kafir
by not believing in him, it follows that the Promised
Messiah was not a prophet. According to accepted Islamic
doctrines, Muslims must believe in all the prophets,
without any exception whatsoever. Therefore, as the
Promised Messiah says "no person becomes a kafir
by denying my claim," it follows
that he is not a prophet. Promised Messiah believed in
finality of prophethood.
Besides the above
argument, the Promised Messiah also made numerous
statements upholding the principle that no prophet
whatsoever can come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad. We
quote some of these below:
I. At one place, he quotes
the Khatam an-nabiyyin verse of the Holy Quran
(33:40), and translates it into Urdu as follows:
"That is to
say, Muhammad is not the father of any man from
among you, but he is the Messenger of Allah, and
the one to end the prophets"
He then comments:
"This verse
also clearly argues that after our Holy Prophet
no messenger (rasul) shall come into the
world"
(Izala
Auham, published September 1891,
p.614.)
2. "The Holy
Quran does not permit the coming of any messenger
after the Khatam an-nabiyyin, whether he
would be a new messenger or a former one."
(Izala
Auham, p.761.)
3. "I firmly
believe that our Holy Prophet Muhammad is the Khatam
al-anbiya, and after him no prophet (nabi)
shall come for this Muslim people, neither
new nor old."
(Nishan
Asmani, published May 1892, p.28.)
4. "It does
not befit God that He should send a prophet after
the Khatam an-nabiyyin, or that He should
re-start the institution of prophethood after
having terminated it."
(A'inah
Kamalat Islam, published Febraary
1893, p.377.)
5. "The real
fact, to which I testify with the highest
testimony, is that our Holy Prophet is the Khatam
al-anbiya, and after him no prophet will
come, neither any old one nor any new one."
(Anjam
Atham, published January 1897, p.27,
footnote)
6. "The Holy
Prophet had repeatedly said that no prophet would
come after him, and the hadith 'There is no
prophet after me' was so well-known that no
one had any doubt about its authenticity. And the
Holy Quran, every word of which is binding, in
its verse 'he is the Messenger of Allah and the Khatam
an-nabiyyin', confirmed that prophethood has
in fact ended with our Holy Prophet."
(Kitab
al-Barriyya, published January 1898,
p.184.)
7. "By saying
'There is no prophet after me', the Holy
Prophet Muhammad closed the door absolutely to
any new prophet or the return of any old
prophet."
(Ayyam
as-SuIh, published August 1898,
p.152.)
8. "If
another prophet were to come, whether new or old,
how could our Holy Prophet Muhammad be the Kh~am
al-anbiya?"
(Ayyam
as-SuIh, p.74.)
9. "The Holy
Prophet Muhammad was the Khatam alanbiya, and
no prophet was to come after him."
(Tazkirat
ash-Shahadatain, published October
1903, p.43)
10.
"Prophethood ended with him [Holy Prophet
Muhammad not only because of his being the last
in time but also because all the accomplishments
of prophethood came to an end with him."
(Lecture
Islam, Sialkot, November
1904, p.6.)
11. "There is
now no need to follow separately all the
prophethoods and all the books which have gone
before because the prophethood of Muhammad
includes and encompasses them all ... Therefore,
with this prophet-hood [of Muhammad] all
prophethoods come to an end. And so it ought to
have been, because that which has a beginning has
also an end."
(AI-Wasiyya,
December 1905, pp.10-Il.)
12. "Allah is
that Being Who ... made Adam, sent messengers,
sent scriptures, and last of all sent Muhammad,
may peace and the blessings of Allah be upon him,
who is the Khatam al-anbiya and the best
of messengers."
(Haq'iqat
al-Wahy, published May 1907, p.141.)
The writings quoted above
range from the time Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to
be the Promised Messiah in 1891 till near the end of his
life. So it cannot be argued that these were his
"earlier books" after which he changed his
views.
It may be noted that the
Promised Messiah has here proved from the Holy Quran and
the Hadith that no prophet, new or old, can come after
the Holy Prophet Muhammad. However, the Qadianis, very
frequently in their publications, purport to give
evidence from the Holy Quran, the Hadith, and the
writings of Muslim religious authorities since the time
of the Holy Prophet, to try to show the reverse, that
prophethood has not ended with the Holy Prophet Muhammad
and that prophets can still appear after him. The same
sources cited by the Qadianis were also in the view, and
under the study, of the Promised Messiah. But he drew
from them the opposite conclusion and wrote that
"the Holy Quran does not permit the coming of any
messenger after the Khatam an-nabiyyin," and
that "the Holy Prophet Muhammad closed the door
absolutely to any new prophet or the return of any old
prophet."
M. Mahmud Ahmad's
belief that prophets can still come.
Although it is a
well-known Qadiani doctrine that prophethood has not
ended with the Holy Prophet Muhammad and that prophets
can come after him till the end of the world, nonetheless
we quote below from some of the writings of Mirza Mahmud
Ahmad laying down this belief. He writes in his book Anwar-i
Khilafat:
"Likewise
they say that however much a person may advance
in virtue and goodness, nay even surpass many
prophets in righteousness and piety, may attain
the utmost knowledge of God, but God will never
make him a prophet, never raise him to that
dignity. Their thinking thus is due to not
assigning to Allah the attributes due to Him;
otherwise to say nothing of one prophet, I say
there shall be thousands of prophets, and
a person who rises to the dignity of prophets
like John can become a prophet. They question the
prophethood of the Promised Messiah, on whom be
peace, but I say, even now there can be a
prophet." (p.62)
"I ask, Is
prophethood a mercy or a curse? If it is a mercy,
then why has it come to an end after the Holy
Prophet Muhammad? It should have increased all
the more after him. He was a prophet of a very
great status. Therefore a prophet who comes after
him must also be of a great status, not that no
one could at all become a prophet." (p.64)
"Even if
someone placed a sword on my neck and told me to
say that no prophet can come after the Holy
Prophet, I would say to him: you are a liar, a
great liar, prophets can come after the Holy
Prophet, most certainly they can." (p.65)
It can be clearly seen how
utterly opposed these views are to the beliefs expressed
by the Promised Messiah as quoted earlier.
Use of term prophet
for Promised Messiah.
The Qadianis, along with
the opponents of the Ahmadiyya Movement, seek to mislead
people by quoting from the Promised Messiah's writings
the use of the words nabi (prophet) and rasul (messenger)
as applying to him. They thus try to show that the
Promised Messiah claimed to be a prophet. What they are
reluctant to quote, however, are the extensive
explanations given by the Promised Messiah of the meaning
and the sense in which these terms apply to him, and his
flat denials of claiming to be a prophet. As this subject
has been fully dealt with in our other literature, here
we merely give one simple argument. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam
Ah mad always wrote, from the time he claimed to be the
Promised Messiah till the end of his life, that these
terms applied to him not in their real sense but
in their metaphorical sense, the sense in which
they apply to every saint (wali or muhaddas) in
Islam. Some of his statements are given below:
1. "The coming
Messiah, because of being a muhaddas [A
muhaddas is one who is not a prophet but receives
revelation from God], is metaphorically
also a prophet."
(Izala
Auham, p.349.)
2. "It is true
that, in the revelation which God has sent upon this
servant, the words nabi, rasul and
mursal (prophet and messenger) occur about
myself quite frequently. However, they do not bear
their real sense. ... We believe and acknowledge
that, according to the real meaning of prophethood,
after the Holy Prophet Muhammad no new or former
prophet can come. The Holy Quran forbids the
appearance of any such prophets. But in a metaphorical
sense God can call any recipient of revelation as
nabi or mursal... The Arabs to this day
call even the message-bearer sent by a man as a rasul,
so why is it forbidden for God also to use
the word mursal in a metaphorical sense."
(Siraj
Munir; published March 1897, pp.2-3.)
3. "I say
repeatedly that in these revelations the word mursal
or rasul or nabi which has occurred
about me is not used in its real sense. The real
fact, to which I testify with the highest testimony,
is that our Holy Prophet is the Khatam al-anbiya; and
after him no prophet will come, neither any old one
nor any new one. ... As we have just explained,
sometimes the revelation from God contains such words
about some of His saints (auliya) in a metaphorical
and figurative sense; they are not meant by
way of reality. ... The epithet 'prophet of God' for
the Promised Messiah to come, which is to be found in
Sahih Muslim etc. from the blessed tongue of
the Holy Prophet Muhammad, is meant in the same metaphorical
sense as that in which it occurs in Sufi
literature as an accepted and common term for the
recipient of Divine communication. Otherwise, how can
there be a prophet after the Khatam al-anbiya?"
(Anjam
Atham, pp.27-28, footnote,)
4. "The Holy
Quran clearly states that the Holy Prophet Muhammad
is the Khatam al-anbiya. But our opponents
make Jesus the Khatam al-anbiya, and they say
that the mention of the Messiah as 'prophet of God'
in Sahih Muslim and elsewhere refers to real
prophethood."
(Kitab
aI-Barnyy'a, p.191, footnote.)
What the Promised Messiah
here calls the wrong view held by his opponents, namely,
that mention of the Messiah as 'prophet of God' in Hadith
"refers to real prophethood," has become one of
the principal doctrines of the Qadianis. One of the very
basic arguments advanced by the Qadianis is that, as the
coming Messiah has been called a 'prophet of God' in
Hadith reports, it follows that the true claimant to this
office, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, was a real prophet of
God.
5. "These words (rasul,
etc.) are used by way of metaphor, just
as in Hadith also the word nabi has been used
for the Promised Messiah."
(Arba'in,
published December 1900, No.2, p. 8, footnote.)
6. "Here the
words rasul and nabi which have been
used about me in the revelation from God, that he is
the messenger and prophet of God, are meant in a metaphorical
and figurative sense."
(Arba'in,
No.3, p.25, footnote.)
7. "God
speaks to, and communicates with, His saints (auliya)
in this Ummah, and they are given the colour of
prophets. However, they are not prophets in
reality."
(Mowahib
ur-Rahman, published January 1903.
pp.66-67.)
8. "And I have
been called nabi (prophet) by Allah by
way of metaphor, not by way of
reality."
(Haqi-qat
al-Wahi', Supplement, p.64.)
The Promised Messiah has
consistently explained that a saint in Islam, such as
himself, can be called 'prophet' (nabi) and
'messenger' (rasul) only in a metaphorical sense,
and this does not mean that he becomes a prophet in
reality, because in actual fact the Holy Prophet Muhammad
is the Last Prophet, after whom no prophet whatsoever can
come, new or old.
Denials of claiming
prophethood by Promised Messiah.
We quote below some of the
denials issued by the Promised Messiah to the allegation
that he claimed to be a prophet:
1. "Question: In
the booklet Fath-i Islam you have made a claim
to prophethood. Answer: There is no claim of
prophethood; on the contrary, the claim is of being a
muhaddas, which has been put forward by the
command of God."
(lzala
Auham, p.421.)
2. "I have heard
that some leading Ulama of this city [Delhi] are
giving publicity to the allegation against me that I
lay claim to prophethood. ... these allegations are
an entire fabrication, I do not make a claim to
prophet-hood. ... After our leader and master,
Muhammad mustafa, may peace and the blessings
of God be upon him, the last of the messengers, I
consider anyone who claims prophethood and
messengership to be a liar and kafir."
(Statement
issued 2 October 1891. Majma'a Ishtiharat,
vol. 1, pp. 230-231.)
3. "Those people
have fabricated a lie against me who say that I claim
to be a prophet."
(Hamamat
aI-Bushra; published 1894, p.8.)
4. "I have not
claimed prophethood, nor have I said to them that I
am a prophet ... I did not say anything to the people
except what I wrote in my books, namely, that I am a muhaddas
and God speaks to me as He speaks to the muhaddases.
... It does not befit me that I should claim
prophethood and leave Islam and join the
disbelievers. ... How could I claim prophethood when
I am a Muslim."
(Hamamat
aI-Bushra, p.79.)
5. "By way of a
fabrication, they slander me by alleging that I have
made a claim to prophethood and that I deny miracles
and the angels. It should be remembered that all this
is a fabrication."
(Kitab
al-Barriyya, p.182, footnote.)
6. "I make no
claim to prophethood. This is your mistake, or you
have some motive in mind. Is it necessary that a
person who claims to receive revelation should also
be a prophet?"
(Jung
Muqaddas, June 1893, p.67.)
7. "I am not a
prophet but a muhaddas from God, and a
recipient of Divine revelation."
(A'inah
Kamalat Islam, p.383.)
8. "Another
stupidity is that, in order to provoke the ignorant
people, they say that I have claimed prophethood.
This is a complete fabrication on their part."
(Haqiqat
al-Wahy, p.390.)
9. "Let it be
clear to him [an opponent Maulvi] that I also curse
the person who claims prophethood, and I believe that
'There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His
Messenger', and I have faith in the finality of
prophet-hood of the Holy Prophet Muhammad. ... there
is no claim of prophethood on my part either, only a
claim of sainthood (wilayat) and reformership (mujaddidiyyar)."
(Announcement
issued January 1897. see Majma'a Ishtiharat,
vol. ii, pp.297-298.)
10. "Can a
wretched imposter who claims messengership and
prophethood for himself have any belief in the Holy
Quran? And can a man who believes in the Holy Quran,
and believes the verse 'He is the Messenger of
Allah and the Khatam an-nabiyyin' to be the word
of God, say that he is a messenger and prophet after
the Holy Prophet Muhammad?"
(Anjam
Atham, p.27, footnote.)
|