Some
of the recognised Muslim theologians and saints have
expressed the following views on the use of nabi
and rasul in a broader sense: Shah Wali-ullah of Delhi (d.
1763 C.E.) writes:
``Remember that the
Saying of the Holy Prophet which mentions a large
number of prophets includes muhaddases in its
count.''
(Al-Khair
al-Kaseer, Urdu translation, p. 246)
The Saying referred to
is the well-known one which mentions the number of
prophets (nabi) that ever appeared as 124,000.
Shah Wali-ullah says that the Holy Prophet has used
the word nabi here to include those who were
merely muhaddas.
Maulana Sana-ullah of
Panipat: a classical commentator of the Quran, writes
in his commentary:
``Rasul has a
broad significance, applying both to men and angels.
Some scholars say that, as a general metaphor, the
word rasul is applied to saints as well.''
(Tafsir
Mazhari, p. 140)
Sayyid Muhammad Ismail
Shaheed (d. 1831 C.E.) wrote:
``Muhaddases
too are called rasul.''
(Abqaat,
Urdu translation by Manazir Ahsan Gilani, published
in A.P., India, p. 402)
Maulana Mufti
Kifayat-ullah: a theologian of this century who was
head of the Jami`at al-`Ulama, India, defined a muhaddas
as follows:
``A muhaddas is
he who receives the word of God by special
revelation. Some scholars consider such a one to be a
prophet of a low rank, and others consider him to be
a saint of a high order.''
(Majalis
al-Abrar, by Shaikh Ahmad Rumi, translated by
Maulana Mufti Kifayat-ullah, footnote by the
translator, p. 48 of the edition published by Darul
Ishaat, Karachi, August 1978.)
Allama Khalid Mahmud:
A present-day theologian, has commented as follows on the
writings of Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Rumi:
``In this respect, the
Maulana refers to every spiritual leader who follows
the Sunna as metaphorically a prophet.''
(`Aqidat
al-Umma fi ma`ni khatam an-nubuwwat, published by
Idara Hifz-i Muarif-i Islamia, Lahore, 3rd ed., 1965,
p.\ 112)
Mulla Ali Qari
wrote in his famous classical work:
``To be a metaphorical
prophet does not constitute kufr nor an
innovation.''
(Sharh
Shifa, vol. ii, p. 518)
|